top of page
Search

Post 30: Data Collection for Deep Sea Mining Impacts

Welcome all to the future!

This week we shall be exploring what many think (i think) is the future of resource extraction. As the demand for rare minerals and resources grows, deep-sea mining has emerged as a promising avenue for meeting global economic needs. However, this burgeoning industry poses significant environmental risks to some of the planet’s least understood and most fragile ecosystems. Understanding the potential impacts of deep-sea mining is crucial for ensuring that resource extraction does not irreversibly harm marine biodiversity and ecosystem health.

Central to this understanding is the meticulous collection of data. Robust data collection enables accurate impact assessments, informs sustainable mining practices, and guides regulatory policies. In this post, we will delve into the key types of data necessary for assessing the impacts of deep-sea mining and highlight why comprehensive data collection is essential for protecting our ocean’s future.

ree

Key Data Needed for Deep Sea Mining Impact Assessment

Environmental Data
Assessing the environmental impact of deep-sea mining begins with comprehensive environmental data. This includes information on sediment disturbance, water quality, and changes in marine biodiversity. Sediment disturbance data helps in understanding how mining activities alter the seafloor, potentially disrupting habitats for various marine species. Monitoring water quality is essential to detect any contamination from mining operations, such as increased levels of heavy metals or changes in nutrient concentrations, which can have cascading effects on marine life. Additionally, biodiversity data, including species distribution and abundance, allows scientists to evaluate the health of marine ecosystems and identify any declines in vulnerable or endangered species resulting from mining activities.

Geological Data
Geological data is critical for both locating viable mining sites and assessing the potential environmental impacts of mining operations. Information on mineral deposits, seafloor topography, and physical ocean conditions provides a comprehensive understanding of the geological landscape. Detailed maps of the seafloor help identify areas rich in valuable minerals while also highlighting regions that may be ecologically sensitive or prone to geological disturbances. Understanding the physical conditions of the ocean floor, such as tectonic activity and sediment composition, is essential for predicting how mining operations might alter the seafloor structure and stability, potentially leading to long-term environmental consequences.

Socioeconomic Data
While the environmental implications of deep-sea mining are paramount, it is equally important to consider the socioeconomic aspects. Fisheries data, tourism impact assessments, and coastal development statistics provide insights into how mining activities might affect local economies and communities. For instance, data on fish stock levels and fishing efforts can help determine if mining operations could disrupt fishing grounds, thereby impacting livelihoods dependent on fisheries. Tourism data, particularly in regions where marine attractions are a significant economic driver, can reveal potential declines in visitor numbers if marine ecosystems are degraded. Additionally, understanding coastal development patterns aids in assessing how mining activities might influence infrastructure and land use, ensuring that economic growth does not come at the expense of environmental sustainability.

ree

Methods of Data Collection in Deep Sea Mining

Remote Sensing and Satellite Data
Remote sensing and satellite technology play a pivotal role in collecting large-scale environmental data related to deep-sea mining. Satellites are used to monitor ocean surface conditions, such as temperature and water quality, which can be affected by mining activities. Satellite imagery also helps in tracking sediment plumes caused by disturbances to the seafloor. These plumes can travel vast distances, affecting water quality and marine habitats far from the mining site. By continuously gathering data from space, researchers can detect changes over time and assess the broader environmental impacts of deep-sea mining operations.

AUVs and ROVs
Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) and Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROVs) are essential tools for deep-sea data collection. These unmanned submersibles can operate at extreme depths, allowing researchers to gather data directly from the ocean floor. AUVs and ROVs are equipped with high-resolution cameras, sonar, and other sensors that capture detailed images and measurements of seafloor topography, sediment composition, and biodiversity. These vehicles can explore mining sites and nearby ecosystems, providing critical data on the physical and biological impacts of mining activities. AUVs and ROVs also enable scientists to take samples of water, sediment, and biological material for further analysis.

In-Situ Sampling
In-situ sampling involves direct collection of samples from the ocean environment, providing invaluable data on localised conditions around mining sites. This method allows researchers to analyse water chemistry, sediment composition, and marine species in real-time. For example, water samples can be tested for the presence of heavy metals or other contaminants released during mining operations. Sediment samples help scientists understand how mining activities affect seafloor stability and habitat integrity. In-situ sampling is particularly useful for validating remote sensing and AUV data, ensuring that models accurately reflect real-world conditions.

Proxy Data
In cases where direct data collection is difficult due to the remoteness or inaccessibility of deep-sea mining sites, proxy data can be used. Proxy data refers to indirect measurements or data from similar ecosystems that can provide insights into potential impacts. For example, data from nearby marine ecosystems or historical data on similar mining operations may be used to predict the effects of new mining projects. While proxy data is not a perfect substitute for direct measurements, it helps fill in data gaps and supports more comprehensive impact assessments when direct access to sites is limited.

Data from Research Institutions
Many global institutions, such as the International Seabed Authority (ISA) and NOAA, collect and maintain vast databases on ocean health, biodiversity, and deep-sea ecosystems. These research bodies provide baseline data essential for comparing pre- and post-mining conditions. Historical datasets on seafloor composition, oceanographic conditions, and marine species diversity offer a valuable foundation for assessing the environmental changes that occur as a result of mining activities. Collaborating with these institutions allows mining operators and regulators to build on existing research and integrate long-term data into their impact assessments.

ree

Challenges in Data Collection for Deep Sea Mining

Accessibility and Depth
One of the main challenges in collecting data for deep-sea mining impact assessments is the extreme depths and remoteness of these environments. Many mining sites are located several kilometers beneath the ocean surface, making access difficult and expensive. The technology required to reach these depths, such as AUVs and ROVs, is costly and often limited in availability. Additionally, the harsh conditions of the deep sea, including high pressure and low temperatures, make it difficult to conduct long-term monitoring.

Despite these challenges, advancements in deep-sea exploration technology are allowing scientists to gather more data than ever before. However, the costs and logistical difficulties mean that consistent, widespread data collection is still a significant hurdle for fully understanding the impacts of deep-sea mining.

Data Gaps
Another major issue is the scarcity of long-term and consistent data on deep-sea ecosystems. Because of the inaccessibility of many mining sites, researchers often rely on fragmented data collected over short periods or from specific locations. This makes it difficult to get a complete picture of the long-term and cumulative impacts of mining activities.

Data gaps can lead to incomplete or skewed impact assessments, making it harder to predict the full effects of mining on marine ecosystems. Closing these gaps requires more frequent and widespread data collection efforts, as well as collaboration between research institutions, governments, and industry stakeholders.

Standardisation
Data collection in deep-sea mining is often carried out by different organisations, using various methods and formats. This lack of standardisation can make it difficult to compare data sets or integrate information from different sources. For example, if one group uses different sampling techniques than another, the results might not be directly comparable.

Standardising data collection methods and formats is crucial for ensuring that all collected data is consistent and reliable. Without standardisation, it becomes challenging to build accurate models and forecasts for predicting mining impacts. International cooperation and guidelines are needed to create uniform practices for data collection in deep-sea environments.

Using Data for Sustainable Mining Practices

Modelling and Forecasting
Data collection is not just about observing current impacts—it’s also essential for predicting future consequences of deep-sea mining. Once collected, data is used to build models that simulate various scenarios. For instance, models can estimate how sediment plumes will spread, how marine species will be affected, or how water quality might change over time. These forecasts help mining operators and policymakers make informed decisions to minimise long-term damage to the marine environment.

Predictive models are a powerful tool for developing more sustainable mining practices. By using these forecasts, companies can adjust their operations to reduce negative impacts before they become irreversible.

Regulatory Frameworks
Regulatory bodies rely on data to develop and enforce guidelines for deep-sea mining. Environmental impact assessments, backed by robust data, help shape policies that protect vulnerable ecosystems while allowing for resource extraction. For example, governments and international organisations can set limits on mining activities in areas with high biodiversity or create "no-go" zones where mining is prohibited altogether.

Accurate data enables regulators to make science-based decisions that balance economic development with the need to protect the marine environment.

Balancing Economic and Environmental Considerations
Data collected from deep-sea mining operations helps stakeholders strike a balance between the economic benefits of extracting valuable minerals and the need to preserve marine ecosystems. By analysing the data, companies can explore ways to improve their mining practices, reducing harm to the environment while still maintaining profitability. For instance, using data to guide more efficient mining techniques can limit the physical footprint of operations on the seafloor.

Ultimately, comprehensive data allows decision-makers to weigh the pros and cons of deep-sea mining and to pursue strategies that protect both the ocean and future economic opportunities.

ree
Concluding remarks

Collecting accurate and comprehensive data is essential for understanding the environmental impacts of deep-sea mining. By leveraging advanced tools like AUVs, satellite data, and predictive models, researchers and stakeholders can make informed decisions that balance the economic benefits of resource extraction with the need to protect fragile marine ecosystems. Though challenges like accessibility, data gaps, and standardisation remain, ongoing improvements in technology and collaboration offer hope for more sustainable mining practices in the future.

Thank you for reading:) Stay tuned for next week's post on emerging technologies for mitigating the environmental impacts of deep-sea mining.


"The best way to predict the future is to invent it." — Alan Kay




Sources

Key Data Needed for Deep Sea Mining Impact Assessment
Miller, K. A., Thompson, K. F., Johnston, P., & Santillo, D. (2018). An overview of seabed mining including the current state of development, environmental impacts, and knowledge gaps. Frontiers in Marine Science, 4, 418.

Methods of Data Collection in Deep Sea Mining
Levin, L. A., Mengerink, K., Gjerde, K. M., Rowden, A. A., Van Dover, C. L., Clark, M. R., ... & Smith, C. R. (2016). Defining “serious harm” to the marine environment in the context of deep-seabed mining. Marine Policy, 74, 245-259.

Challenges in Data Collection for Deep Sea Mining
Trice, A., Robbins, C., Philip, N. and Rumsey, M., 2021. Challenges and opportunities for ocean data to advance conservation and management. Ocean Conservancy: Washington, DC, USA.

Using Data for Sustainable Mining Practices
Wedding, L. M., Reiter, S. M., Smith, C. R., Gjerde, K. M., Kittinger, J. N., Friedlander, A. M., ... & Crowder, L. B. (2015). Managing mining of the deep seabed. Science, 349(6244), 144-145.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page